| Lineage 2 Game PMfun Forum https://forum.pmfun.com/ |
|
| Why surrender to fire for warlok? https://forum.pmfun.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=36703 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | archfiend [ Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Why surrender to fire for warlok? |
Maybe i am an ignorant and i choose the easy way to find out this, maybe is really funny. Can some one please tell me why the warlok learns mass surrender to fire? Does he have at all one skill wich he can combo with this? Or is it just for role playing? Or is it just because NCSoft considers it ok? Again, if there is good reason for this forgive my ignorance. Cheers 
|
|
| Author: | kisi [ Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why surrender to fire for warlok? |
Maybe good for mass pvp?
|
|
| Author: | chester [ Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why surrender to fire for warlok? |
archfiend wrote: Maybe i am an ignorant and i choose the easy way to find out this, maybe is really funny. Can some one please tell me why the warlok learns mass surrender to fire? Does he have at all one skill wich he can combo with this? Or is it just for role playing? Or is it just because NCSoft considers it ok? Again, if there is good reason for this forgive my ignorance. Cheers im sure you are not an ignorant, and if you are, im too! that skill dont have any combo, but the only thing to understand this is : sorcerer (fire) -> warlock (mass surrender to fire) spellhowler (wind) -> phantom summoner (mass surrender to wind) mystic muse (water) -> elemental summoner (mass surrender to water) maybe if you play in party with the nuker of your same type (human with human, elf with elft, dark elf with dark elf)... NCSOFT think that its an usefull skill but anyway, its stupid in new chronicles your summon get the same element to attack that you have in your weapon, so PERHAPS if you are warlock with fire attribute, its a little usefull because your summon will hit with fire and with surrender to fire.. |
|
| Author: | archfiend [ Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why surrender to fire for warlok? |
Quote: that skill dont have any combo, but the only thing to understand this is : sorcerer (fire) -> warlock (mass surrender to fire) spellhowler (wind) -> phantom summoner (mass surrender to wind) mystic muse (water) -> elemental summoner (mass surrender to water) maybe if you play in party with the nuker of your same type (human with human, elf with elft, dark elf with dark elf)... NCSOFT think that its an usefull skill but anyway, its stupid in new chronicles your summon get the same element to attack that you have in your weapon, so PERHAPS if you are warlock with fire attribute, its a little usefull because your summon will hit with fire and with surrender to fire.. This make sense, thanks a lot mate
|
|
| Author: | BigLoL [ Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why surrender to fire for warlok? |
chester wrote: archfiend wrote: Maybe i am an ignorant and i choose the easy way to find out this, maybe is really funny. Can some one please tell me why the warlok learns mass surrender to fire? Does he have at all one skill wich he can combo with this? Or is it just for role playing? Or is it just because NCSoft considers it ok? Again, if there is good reason for this forgive my ignorance. Cheers im sure you are not an ignorant, and if you are, im too! that skill dont have any combo, but the only thing to understand this is : sorcerer (fire) -> warlock (mass surrender to fire) spellhowler (wind) -> phantom summoner (mass surrender to wind) mystic muse (water) -> elemental summoner (mass surrender to water) maybe if you play in party with the nuker of your same type (human with human, elf with elft, dark elf with dark elf)... NCSOFT think that its an usefull skill but anyway, its stupid in new chronicles your summon get the same element to attack that you have in your weapon, so PERHAPS if you are warlock with fire attribute, its a little usefull because your summon will hit with fire and with surrender to fire.. hehe nice theory but in practice: its not worth to use surrenders - waste of time and mana now think about mass surrenders :s |
|
| Author: | mariolinho [ Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why surrender to fire for warlok? |
BigLoL wrote: its not worth to use surrenders - waste of time and mana now think about mass surrenders :s if u AOE (and u have a wepon - 300 atribute and +15 horse ) is kinda usefull that mass surrender *h/e in pi u can AOE and 1 hit them all if u have 300 on wepon (or less prolly also works 1 hit) |
|
| Author: | BigLoL [ Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why surrender to fire for warlok? |
mariolinho wrote: BigLoL wrote: its not worth to use surrenders - waste of time and mana now think about mass surrenders :s if u AOE (and u have a wepon - 300 atribute and +15 horse ) is kinda usefull that mass surrender *h/e in pi u can AOE and 1 hit them all if u have 300 on wepon (or less prolly also works 1 hit) if u have 300 in weapon mass surrender is totally useless lol 
|
|
| Author: | GoDs3nD [ Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why surrender to fire for warlok? |
pro theories here
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 2 hours |
| Powered by PMfun ©2006-2010 | |